3/5 ★ – CarlitoLupin's review of MindsEye.

Here’s a comprehensive look at MindsEye—why it’s drawing so much hate, along with its pros and cons: ⸻ 📉 Why it’s so hated • Technical meltdowns: Developers and critics alike describe it as feeling like an alpha build—it’s plagued by severe stuttering, long loading times, frequent crashes, NPCs glitching (e.g., floating, disappearing), and horrific ragdoll physics  . • Buggy and unoptimized: Even on PS5 Pro and high-end PCs, users report jarring pop‑ins, disappearing enemies, asset streaming issues, and unpredictable vehicle physics that leave cars exploding or flipping over spontaneously . • Uninspired design: Gameplay is criticized for being formulaic and dull – with repetitive driving missions and cover‑based shooting that feels dated, like a throwback to 2012-era shooters . • Shallow narrative: Plot and characters use clichéd sci‑fi tropes—amnesia, tech corporations, neural implants—but fail to leave a deep emotional impact . • Controversies and hype backlash: Overhyped marketing, accusations of paid negative reviews, Twitch stream shutdowns, and executive turmoil have fueled negative sentiment . ⸻ ✅ Pros: A few bright spots • Visually atmospheric: The dystopian, neon-soaked desert cityscape of Redrock (akin to a fake-Las Vegas) is impressive, with some standout set-pieces and convincing futuristic design . • Occasional fun in combat & driving: Shooting mechanics can feel satisfying in bursts, while driving—especially with loose car physics—can be enjoyable, reminiscent of classic games like Driver . • Level editor at launch: The inclusion of a powerful user-generated content tool (level editor tied to the larger Everywhere ecosystem) is a bold move for creative players . ⸻ ⚠️ Cons: Where it falls flat Issue Details Gameplay Repetitive missions, stiff cover system, dull pacing, and limited variety . Technical Serious performance issues, glitches, inconsistent AI, unstable on all platforms . Story & characters Forgettable protagonist, shallow storytelling, wasted sci‑fi setups . Stunted open world Limited exploration, padded with fetch quests and travel driving rather than meaningful content . ⸻ 📊 Aggregate sentiment • Metacritic score: Around 30–40 out of 100, with widespread negative critique . • Steam user feedback: “Mostly Negative”, with many players refunding the full-price release ($60 / £55+) . • Media consensus: Descriptions range from “dystopian future that plays like 2012” to “uninspired Netflix‑style background cinema” . ⸻ 🎥 Watch the reaction Check out this video review—vividly titled “I beat MindsEye. It’s one of the worst video games I’ve ever played”—which captures the game’s many breakdowns and glitches: ⸻ 🧭 Verdict MindsEye had ambitious ideas—futuristic visuals, a critic of corporate AI, and robust creation tools—but the execution collapsed under technical flaws, bored design, and underdeveloped story. It hovers between “so-bad-it’s-memorable” and a cautionary tale of being unfinished yet priced as AAA. ⸻ 🎯 Who might still enjoy it? • Players drawn to visual aesthetics and cyber-noir settings. • Those who enjoy toolsets and creative level building. • Fans of nostalgic, sandbox-style third-person shooters who can tolerate the rough edges. ⸻ Bottom line: Its hype was aspirational, but the reality delivered was rough, unfinished, and ultimately more embarrassing than entertaining—earning the ire of critics and players alike.